Motion to Compel on "income" verification. The husband is represented by counsel.
His lawyer said; defendants counsel is "fishing" and has been provided income verification in 3 separate depositions, and employer records as well as tax returns.
How could someone not connected with a case affect it, when defendant's lawyer got what they requested?
Plaintiff was denied right to inspect defendants public institution emails and they admitted to spoliation on the record during deposition (no sanction).
Does this sound like it is going well so far for the plaintiff?