I guess pain and suffering isn't an option
Not without a condition that caused debilitating harm beyond the original condition.
In other words, the first doctor made her no worse off than she was before.
It was pain and suffering that she had before.
I'm not trying to be unsympathetic, just explaining the legal issues that eliminate any chance of compensation.
Again, I'm not a malpractice attorney (or any kind of attorney), so I'm not the last word on the subject.